This volume is the documentary record supporting Volumes I and II. Exhibits A through M were filed with Petition 3 on August 17, 2026 and are carried forward unchanged. Exhibits N through R are records produced, received, or created since that date and are new to this filing. Every item is a public record: produced by the City under Chapter 610 RSMo, filed by the applicant with the State of Missouri, or recorded with Warren County.
| Ex. | Record |
|---|---|
| A | June 11, 2026 Board of Aldermen minutes and Conditions 1–5. |
| B | Ordinance No. 1108 and Wright City Code §410.010(G). |
| C | Planning and Zoning Commission minutes, including August 18, 2025. |
| D | Site plan and plan sheets. |
| E | Sunshine Law requests and the City’s responses. |
| F | Recorder of Deeds correspondence. |
| G | The six parcels and conceptual Lots 1–5. |
| H | DNR stormwater and air-permit documents. |
| I | Public Water Supply District and utility documents. |
| J | 41 Roelker Road comparison, Ordinance No. 1104. |
| K | Other directly relevant records. |
| L | School District and MoDOT records. |
| M | August 6, 2026 production: final consolidation plat and the July 15, 2026 §410.010(G) plan review. |
| Ex. | Record | What it establishes |
|---|---|---|
| N | The three civil plan sets side by side: June 13, 2025 (Sheet C-1, 33 acres); January 29, 2026 v2 (Lot 5, 36.4 acres); July 8, 2026 (Sheet C-2, no labeled storage area). | The material change in the operating configuration, and that the Commission reviewed and voted on only one plan set, dated June 13, 2025 — its single recorded action, taken August 18, 2025. No record shows a Commission review or recommendation on the January 29, 2026 set the Board approved, or on the July 8, 2026 set now before it. |
| O | August 15, 2025 Clerk transmittal email and the August 18, 2025 Commission packet as produced. | Which plan set the Commission actually received, and that the packet contains no photometric plan. |
| P | July 10, 2026 written requests for Board of Adjustment review and the City’s July 16, 2026 response declining to accept or docket them. | That the requests were filed within thirty days of the June 11 decision, and that the City stated no administrative zoning determination had been made. |
| Q | City Clerk’s fee emails of June 10, 2026 assessing $11,600 on approximately 58 acres, with Sheet C-2’s “Total Project Area: 58 Acres” and its stormwater summary. | That the project was billed as a 58-acre development the day before an approval covering about five acres that excludes the storage area. |
| R | BFA Engineering letters of February 10, 2026 and the Clerk’s forwarded BFA email of August 28, 2026; CBB technical memorandum of May 20, 2026, invoice 260280001 at 75% complete, and check #57075. | That the stormwater review was prepared against the superseded five-lot plan and that no final construction plans or final traffic study exist. |
Each of the following is the City’s own written answer under Chapter 610 RSMo, produced August 6, 2026 unless otherwise noted. They are not characterizations by the petitioners.
| July 10, 2026 | Board of Adjustment review requests. Declined July 16, 2026. |
| July 20, 2026 | Petition 1, Volumes I–IV. |
| July 21, 2026 | Supplemental Clarification No. 1. |
| July 23, 2026 | Written public comment. |
| July 31, 2026 | Petition 2, revised volumes, 123 verified signatures. |
| August 17, 2026 | Petition 3, Volumes I–IV, with seven written questions. |
| August 18, 2026 | Supplemental Clarification No. 2. |
| September 21, 2026 | Petition 4, Volumes I–IV. Volume III records 149 verified responses. |
No substantive response has been received to any of them. The City’s reply of July 20, 2026 at 8:57 AM confirmed that the filing had been forwarded to the City Attorney, the Mayor, the Board of Aldermen, the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Zoning Officer, the Building/Permits Official “and any other official responsible for this matter” and “filed for the record.” That is a confirmation of distribution, not a decision.